Archive for the 'Reading' Category

Misery Lit: Have We Had Our Fill?

Pam May 5th, 2010

I recently read that Daisy Goodwin, Orange Prize chair, was bothered by the unrelenting “misery” going on in the books eligible for the prize. In case you’re not familiar, the Orange Prize is awarded to a woman writer of any nationality for a novel written in English. After reading 129 novels, Ms. Goodwin told the Guardian, “There’s not been much wit and not much joy, there’s a lot of grimness out there…Pleasure seems to have become a rather neglected element in publishing.” She went on to say, “I was surprised at how little I laughed…and the [books] where there was humour were much appreciated, I can tell you.”

What really struck me was I how much I agreed with her. My book club had just read Shanghai Girls, by Lisa See. Most of us felt that while the book was well written and had compelling moments, it was also unrelenting in its misery. (We’re all fans of Snowflower and the Secret Fan and Peony in Love, BTW.) I can’t speak for everyone, but personally I felt it could have used some lightness—humor, romance, wit…anything to relieve the grimness of the story.

YA lit has its share of misery right now, too. Suzanne Collins, in her post-apocalyptic novels, The Hunger Games and Catching Fire, while making every moment gripping and often terrifying, somehow managed to instill a bit of hope. Maybe it’s in the quiet way Peeta loves Katniss, or in the way each wishes to save the other. I wish other writers of dystopian fiction would work a little harder at taking the edge off the hopelessness with a bit of joy. Find something to celebrate in all the bleakness. Something with a human connection.

I know we’re living in a scary, crazy world, and modern fiction reflects the concerns and anxieties of writers, and readers, too, I suppose. But I do wish all the horror, hopelessness, and mayhem could be interspersed with some offsetting moments of happiness. Isn’t that more reflective of life?

To quote Daisy Goodwin again, “I’m more of a light and shade person and there does need to be some joy, not just misery.”

What do you think? Are you longing for a little joy and humor in your reading?

Review of The Champion

Pam November 8th, 2009

Elizabeth Chadwick has been publishing for years. Why did it take me so long to find her?

A writer of historical fiction, her specialty is the Middle Ages. She has nineteen books to her credit. See what I mean about not discovering her before now? Especially since her first book was published in 1989 (The Wild Hunt), and is still in print.

After I read  The Champion (1998), I took a look at her web site. It’s beautifully designed, has a Medieval look to it, and is packed with information about her books and research. You can also find her reference library (an extensive list of her resources), her biography, a glossary, music she enjoys listening to while writing, and much more.

The Champion begins with the two brothers, Hervi and Alexander, around whom most of the story revolves. Hervi is the older, and a seasoned tourney knight. He believes his younger brother Alexander is leading the religious life at Cranwell Abbey, where he’d been sent as a young boy. Abused by one of the priests, however, Alexander escapes and sets out to find his brother. Exhausted and near starvation when he arrives at Hervi’s camp, Alexander begs to be taken in. When he regains his health, Alexander begins training to become a tourney knight. Continue Reading »

My Sinful Secret

Pam September 8th, 2009

Until recently, I was one of those people who never read romances and was proud of it. Ugh. How stupid. How inane. How way, way beneath me. No thanks. Not me. Never. Ever.

Then someone in my Jane Austen group suggested I read a Georgette Heyer novel. Supposedly, the next best thing to reading Jane. Not my words, nor the words of the person who recommended Heyer, but I actually did read that somewhere recently. So I read Bath Tangle, and I loved it, which forced me to read several more of her books. Georgette Heyer, for the uninitiated, is the queen of Regency romance. She practically invented the genre. Her books are full of witty repartee, undercurrents of sexual tension, and meticulous historical detail. Heyer wrote from the 1920’s up until her death in 1974.

Someone else suggested Mary Balogh. I started with A Summer To Remember, read all the Simply’s, plus a few others, and I loved them all. Typically, they have a certain sweetness about them. Then I discovered Julia Quinn. Besides five of the Bridgerton family novels, I read The Secret Diaries of Miss Miranda Cheever and  Mr. Cavendish, I Presume. Quinn’s trademark seems to be humor, sometimes of the laugh-out-loud variety. Then I got going on Jo Beverly and her Rogues, and after that, Stephanie Laurens and the Bastion Club. Are you getting the picture?

Last winter, I was knitting a sweater that was way beyond my abilities, and therefore taking forever. To entertain myself, I began listening to audios of some of these books. Doing so saved me from insanity. Although in retrospect, perhaps concentrating too much on the stories caused me to make all those mistakes which eventually had to be ripped out. Unlike Georgette Heyer’s books, the modern regencies are very sexy!

For pure escapism, the Regencies can’t be beat. Oh, yes, there’s a formula to them, but that’s okay. It’s what romance readers expect, indeed, demand. At least I think it is. Because, as I mentioned before, I’m not really a romance reader.

Jane Austen’s Siblings

Pam August 14th, 2009

Last Sunday I pretended to be Cassandra Austen, sister of the famous writer. I was on a panel of “siblings” at the Denver/Boulder regional meeting of the Jane Austen Society of North America. We panelists fielded questions from our members regarding the sibs-four of the brothers and one sister.

The most compelling question for me as Cassandra was, of course, “Why did you destroy the letters?” What I wanted to say was, “It’s complicated!” But as Cassie, I couldn’t. So, here’s what I actually said:

“Jane and I had a habit of ‘censoring’ each other’s letters when we shared them with the family-leaving out sections when we read them out loud. We both desired this holding back of details meant for ourselves alone.

“I lived 28 years after Jane’s death, thus allowing me a great deal of time to decide what to do with her letters. I destroyed many of them due to their personal and private content. This is what Jane would have wanted. Some were written during periods of great stress, such as the aftermath of the family’s decision to move to Bath; others contained remarks which may have been hurtful to others.

“Jane never desired fame. She wanted recognition, to be taken seriously as a writer, but never fame. Publishing her most private and personal correspondence would have been disgusting to her.”

Other than her correspondence with Cassandra, Jane Austen’s surviving letters are mainly to her nieces and nephews, and a few to friends. Not one to her mother or father. None to Henry, her favorite brother, and the one who helped publish her novels not only in her lifetime, but also after her death. She didn’t live to see Persuasion and Northanger Abbey in print; Cassandra and Henry made certain that the world would have all her work. And we are eternally grateful!

One poignant image I haven’t been able to get out of my mind: Henry riding alongside the carriage carrying Jane Austen and Cassandra to Winchester, Jane’s final journey.  Apparently it rained throughout the 16 mile trip. How appropriate.

Review of Sovay

Pam July 7th, 2009

Celia Rees is an amazing writer. I was a great fan of her book Vanished, and I think Sovay is even better. With a large cast of characters, it must be difficult to give a distinctive voice to each one, but she manages to pull it off. And Sovay herself is a gem. Bold, adventurous, strong-willed, she is the embodiment of what we women would all like to be, if we only had the nerve.

Most of the book is set in England, in 1794. Sovay, betrayed by her first love, decides to re-invent herself as a highwayman. As it turns out, she robs a coach carrying the lover who spurned her. He then takes his revenge by reporting her father as a traitor.

Sovay goes to London to try to warn her father, who has been away from Compton, their country home, for some time. The housekeeper informs her that her father is no longer there. Meanwhile, Gabriel, son of the Compton steward, checks on Sovay’s brother Hugh at Oxford. He discovers that Hugh was “sent down” because he wrote a seditions pamphlet. He has fled to France.

While in London, Sovay meets the spymaster Robert Dysart. As it turns out, he’s the one orchestrating the campaign against Sovay’s father, and countless others. A high official in the British government, he obsesses about the English rebelling, as the French did. He has taken matters into his own hands and is the epitome of evil.

Sovay is surrounded by men: Gabriel Stanhope; Virgil Barrett, an American who has taken on the job of warning people about Dysart; Captain Greenwood, a highwayman Sovay meets in her escapades; her brother Hugh, who finally makes an appearance in London; Mr. Oldfield, family friend and solicitor who is also working against Dysart. Eventually, in the last third of the book, Sovay, Hugh, and Virgil end up fleeing to France because they’re wanted for treason in England. There, Sovay meets the dashing Captain Leon, a passionate believer in the French cause. The two fall in love.

The French Revolution has devolved into chaos, with Robespierre at the helm, executing citizens by the hundreds. Sovay’s father is in prison, dangerously ill and awaiting execution. Although Virgil and Leon both try to save her, Sovay herself ends up in prison with her father.

I don’t want to reveal the ending, but it seemed a bit too easy. My only other criticism of the book is that all the men–Gabriel, Virgil, Greenwood, and Leon–are in love with Sovay. Beautiful, clever, and daring, Sovay is undoubetedly appealing, but isn’t it a bit unrealistic that every man she meets immediately falls for her?

But these are minor flaws in an otherwise captivating and wonderfully written book. Sovay is a great read, with danger coming at a furious pace. The political intrigue seems real and always threatening. Thoroughly grounded in her research, Rees made this frightening time come alive for me.

Have you read it, or any of Rees’s other books? What did you think?

Lady Julia Grey Mysteries

Pam May 4th, 2009

I’ve enjoyed reading Deanna Raybourn’s Lady Julia Grey mysteries. Not only has Raybourn created two appealing main characters in Lady Julia and Nicholas Brisbane, but she also has provided a seemingly limitless cast of characters within Lady Julia’s family: her father, her sister Portia, and her many other siblings.

The first book in the series, Silent in the Grave, involves the death of Lady Julia’s husband. Turns out-big surprise-he was murdered. Brisbane, whom her husband had consulted prior to his death, reluctantly steps in to help solve the mystery. He and Lady Julia have an adversarial relationship as well as a strong attraction to each other. Turns out Lady Julia’s marriage was not a happy one, so falling for another man so soon after her husband’s death is easily forgiven. The mystery is intriguing, and the murderer turns out to be someone you’d least suspect. Continue Reading »

Historical Mysteries

Pam April 12th, 2009

I love historical mysteries, especially the English ones. The time peiod doesn’t matter; right now I’m following several series from different centuries.

Some crucial ingredients for historical mysteries, at least in my mind, are characterization, period detail, and mood. And of course, a mystery that keeps you guessing until the end, with plenty of plot twists and reversals. A little romance thrown into the mix isn’t bad, either!

Two series I’ve been into lately are C.S.’s Harris’s Sebastian St. Cyr mysteries, set during the Regency, and Deanna Raybourn’s Lady Julia Gray mysteries, which are Victorian. They make an interesting contrast: the first with a male protagonist, the second, a woman.

Sebastian St. Cyr, the dashing Viscount Devlin, is our hero in Harris’s books. There are now four of them: What Angels Fear, When Gods Die, Where Serpents Sleep, and Why Mermaids Sing. Devlin is handsome, smart, brooding, fearless, and his life itself is a mystery of sorts. He was not in line to inherit his father’s title, but his two older brothers both died young. He feels he’s been a disappointment to his father, especially because of his liaison with Kat Boleyn, an actress. In the third book, he finds out the real reason his father is so opposed to their romance, and it’s devastating. But, of course, all may not be what it seems. Continue Reading »

The New Maisie Dobbs, Among the Mad

Pam March 26th, 2009

Am I the only Maisie Dobbs fan who didn’t like this book? Judging from the various reviews I’ve read or skimmed, everyone has nothing but praise for it. Although the New York Times crime critic, Marilyn Stasio, did refer to Maisie as “humorless.” In spades.

Some of what was wrong with this book could have been fixed by line editing, or an editor’s eye. Certain phrases were repeated numerous times. For example, when Maisie shook hands with male detectives from Scotland Yard, she’d say, “He held onto my hand a few more seconds than was absolutely necessary.” That lets us know, I guess, that they’re attracted to Maisie and revealing their feelings in an inappropriate way which she does not appreciate. Part of the humorlessness, I guess. Continue Reading »

The Hunger Games

Pam March 17th, 2009

I just experienced The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins. Yes, experienced. I listened to it, read by Carolyn McCormick. You would probably recognize her voice, as I did, from Law and Order. She’s played the part of Dr. Elizabeth Olivet for many years (in addition to her many roles in the theater, movies, and other TV shows). Her reading of the book was powerful and mesmerizing. She had many different characters to perform–young, old, male, female, humorous, deadly serious–and despite the challenge of portraying such varied characters, McCormick gave each one a distinct voice. Bravo!

It will take time for me to digest this book. I’ll try to very briefly encapsulate the plot: A country called Panem is divided into 12 districts which surround the Capitol, a gleaming, prosperous city where all power and wealth reside. We learn that Panem was once North America, apparently destroyed by global warming and other disasters. In the aftermath, Panem was formed, comprised of 13 districts. During an uprising many years ago, District 13, once a part of Panem, was blasted out of existence. In order for all citizens to be reminded of the suffering that might ensue were any other rebellions to take place, each year there are the Hunger Games. First, The Reaping, which simply is the drawing of names. One girl and one boy from each district is chosen. When twelve-year-old Primrose Everdeen’s name is called, her big sister Katniss steps in to take her place. She knows there’s no way her younger sibling could survive the games.

In fact, only one person will survive. The district representatives fight to the death, until only one person remains. The Games are set up in a very elaborate way, with people known as “Gamemakers” pulling all the strings. By chance, the other representative from District 11, a boy named Peeta, is the very one who once gave Katniss a few loaves of bread when her family would surely have starved to death without it. The thought of having to kill or be killed by Peeta preys on Katniss’s mind almost constantly.

Unbeknownst to Katniss, the strategists have decreed that, in order to gain sponsors, Peeta and Katniss will pretend to be in love. When Peeta begins to reveal his feelings for her, she’s not sure what’s real and what is strategy.

We know from the beginning that Catniss is an exceptional girl. She’s been her own family’s salvation since the death of her father four years ago. Her mother went into a deep melancholy after he died, and Catniss has had to be the sole provider for the family. Along the way, she formed a bond with a boy named Gale, her hunting partner. She trusts him to look after her mother and Primrose while she’s at the Games, and while she says they’ve never had a romantic relationship, we can’t help feeling that Gale most likely would have a different perspective. Overall, Catniss seems to have a big blind spot where romance is involved.

I found the beginning of the book haunting and depressing and sad, the way in which The Road, by Cormac MacCarthy, was. As I listened on walks, I found myself crying, sometimes even sobbing, having to look down as other walkers approached. The reader, or listener in my case, feels hopeless. How could this have a satisfying, or even hopeful, ending?

The part of the story involving the preparation for the games, the “branding,” if you will, of each pair of contestants, was the least interesting part of the story, I thought. I understand the necessity–it furthers the horrifying idea that all this is for the entertainment of the Capitol and the people of Panem. But that part of the book seemed to drag a little.

Once the games start, the story is absolutely riveting. Not only are the participants playing against each other, they’re also at the mercy of the Gamemakers, who can control the weather, provide water or take it away, start wildfires, and dangle desperately needed supplies as bait to draw the players into the open. The young representatives start, one by one, to die, in gruesome and unforgettable ways. Each night, portraits of the dead flash into the sky, so that each player knows who’s left in this inhuman contest. Contestants popular with the audience draw sponsors, who sometimes send you much needed supplies or medicines. These float down from the sky via silver parachutes, and of course help keep recipients alive to fight another day.

Since this is The Hunger Games: Book One, we know there’s more to come. I have the feeling that Gale, who’s a rebel at heart, will enlist Katniss in another uprising against the Capitol. I was disappointed that the contestants didn’t rebel against their situation in this book, but when I learned it was the first of a trilogy, I understood that Book One was laying the groundwork. But ultimately, if there’s no rebellion, the cruelty of the Hunger Games becomes somewhat pointless.

I was disappointed that The Hunger Games was shut out of the Printz Awards. With its fully realized characters, creative plot, and brilliant writing, I thought it deserved an award.

What’s your opinion?

Hard Face Moon

Pam February 15th, 2009

Middle grade readers will love Nancy Oswald’s new book, Hard Face Moon, and teachers and librarians will be thrilled to have a work of historical fiction that ties in so well with the curriculum. Published by Filter Press, a Colorado publisher of southwest history, biography, and historical fiction, Hard Face Moon deserves a wide audience.

Hard Face Moon focuses on events leading up to the horrific Sand Creek Massacre. The reader sees the action unfold through the eyes of Hides Inside, a Cheyenne boy. After the trauma of losing both parents when he was barely old enough to walk, Hides Inside hasn’t spoken. Although he sometimes feels words rising in his throat and tries to force them out, nothing happens. Continue Reading »

Next »