Archive for the 'Reading' Category

Present vs. Past Tense

March 10th, 2011

When novels written in present tense first began to appear, I thought sure it was a fad. A trend that would disappear as quickly as it had sprung into being, when sane readers and writers everywhere would agree on how annoying it was.

Wrong. It hasn’t disappeared; in fact, it’s caught on and stuck. People have strong opinions about it, with those who dislike it usually speaking the loudest. Philip Hensher weighed in on verb tense use after the 2010 Booker Prize short list was announced last fall. Three of the shortlisted books were written in present tense. Mr. Hensher took—or should I say takes—strong exception to the practice, calling it “modish,” and in historical fiction, becoming “cliche.”

Philip Pullman also entered the fray. His piece in the Guardian is thoughtful and measured. If your current WIP is in present tense, you might want to see what he has to say.

None of the writing craft books in my collection even mentions verb tense, at least, not as a subject in the index. However, the internet, as you might expect, didn’t disappoint.

Use of the present tense is widespread in YA fiction. Revolution (Jennifer Donnelly), The Forest of Hands and Teeth (Carrie Ryan), By the Time You Read This, I’ll Be Dead (Julie Anne Peters), The Indigo Notebook (Laura Resau), and The Hunger Games Trilogy (Suzanne Collins) are just a few of the titles I found on my bookshelves which are written this way.

And two of the most exciting and creative adult books of the last two years, Wolf Hall (Hilary Mantel) and The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet (David Mitchell) are both in present tense.

After reading dozens of books in the present tense, I began to understand the rationale for using it, and I no longer found it so distracting. It brings immediacy to the writing. It makes the story more compelling, as if it’s happening right now, and I can see why teens like it. I decided to experiment with it in my own writing, with mixed results. It’s not as easy as it looks.

I’ve come to believe that (1) if you’re going to use it, have a darn good reason why it works for the story you’re telling; (2) read it out loud to make sure it doesn’t sound like stage directions; and (3) check and double check it to assure all the verb usage is correct. Using past tense is so much more natural, it’s easy to slip back into it and not even notice.

One other caution. It’s really confusing, once you’ve written in present tense, to change to past. For some reason, none of the verb tenses seem right, or maybe I should say, sound right. This effect wears off eventually, but I don’t think it’s just me. I’ve heard other writers say the same thing.

How do you feel about present tense vs. past tense? Do you notice it as a reader? Do you use it as a writer?

Pride and Prejudice Trivia

February 18th, 2011

Someone in my JASNA group recommended The Annotated Pride and Prejudice, by David M. Shapard, a few years ago. I promptly ordered it, but apart from using it to check a fact every so often,  it’s languished on a bookcase ever since. I decided to read it during my stay in Florida.
So, for my fellow Janeites, here are some P&P tidbits, trivia, and fascinating facts I’ve come across while reading this detailed analysis of my all-time favorite book. My apologies to David M. Shapard if I misinterpreted anything.

Longbourn is, in fact, the name of the village in which the Bennets live, not the name of their house. Although, it seems that often they are speaking of their home when they use the term.
The true extent of Mr. Bennet’s irresponsible, and sometimes even cruel nature, became apparent to me as never before. We know he calls his daughters “silly,” publicly denounces Mary for her piano playing at the Netherfield Ball, and cavalierly tells Elizabeth that all girls like to be “crossed in love a little now and then.” But Elizabeth is the only daughter equipped to handle the sarcasm. When Mr. B. is off trying to find Lydia and Wickham, he can scarcely be bothered to pen a few lines to the family, and only responds to Mr. Gardiner’s important missive at Elizabeth and Jane’s urging.

The revered 1995 version of P&P, as well as the 2005 movie, portray Mr. Bennet as a lovable curmudgeon. I think my view of him had been skewed by watching these so many times!
Mary, of all the sisters, is on scene or even mentioned, very little. There’s an interesting discussion about this online during a Q&A session with the annotator/editor, David Shapard.

I was much more aware of Wickham’s indiscretions when he first meets Elizabeth, and of her eager willingness to believe all he says because of her attraction to him and her dislike of Mr. Darcy.

Elizabeth’s lowest point in the novel: when, all within a brief span, Charlotte accepts Mr. Collins, Mr. Bingley deserts Netherfield and Jane, and Wickham turns his attentions to Miss King and her newly inherited fortune.
Mr. Darcy’s distracted manner, right after Elizabeth tells hm about Lydia and Wickham, was due to the fact that he was already planning what his role might be in recovering her.
Mr. Darcy, did, in fact, wish for a marriage between Mr. Bingley and his sister Georgiana.

I learned the official meaning of  livings, tithes and preferments; what is meant by “picturesque;” all about fenders and fire screens, lodges, paddocks, landscaping, and so much more. Of course, many of these are things I’d drawn conclusions about long ago, but it was good to have a more detailed, historically accurate explanation.

What have you learned on a close reading of Pride and Prejudice? Share your knowledge, please!

To E-read or not to E-read…

December 22nd, 2010

Are you hoping to find an e-reader under the Christmas tree this year?

With the proliferation of devices such as the Kindle, Sony E-Reader, Nook and Nook color, iPad, iPhone, and Android phones, more and more of us who once swore we’d never give up our print books are jumping on the bandwagon. That’s not to say we’re giving up on books in their traditional form; it simply says that we’re willing to read in all sorts of different ways.

E-books were the topic Tuesday on NPR’s Talk of the Nation. Lynn Neary, who covers books for NPR, was one of the guests along with Peter Osnos, former VP at Random House, and founder of Public Affairs Books.

Neary made the point that with the advent of embedded pictures and videos in some of the content one can download, she no longer has reservations about reading children’s picture books in e-format.

But the main point, made by Peter Osnos, was that e-readers, and the content providers (Amazon, Google’s E-Bookstore, Barnes & Noble, etc.) are giving readers a choice. They get to decide when, where, and how to read a book. And he was generous with kudos to Len Riggio, B&N CEO, for offering books via their brick-and-mortar stores, online, and now through the Nook.

Amidst all this enthusiasm, not much mention was made of the fact that many people who might want one can’t afford an e-reader. Will libraries some day be in the business of lending e-readers? No one knew the answer to that question.

Personally, I’m with Peter Osnos. I check a ton of books out of the library, purchase many, and download others. I once downloaded a book onto my Kindle while waiting in line for a flu shot; another time I downloaded one I’d been listening to, because it was taking me too long to get through the audio (this being yet another way in which to consume a book). I guess there’s a subtext of obsessive behavior there!

If you’re doing historical research, the number of books in the public domain available for download is a gift. Often these are rare volumes you’d have to request through inter-library loan. Now you can get them immediately, and for free.

While I love my Kindle, I’m miffed with Amazon for their proprietary arrangement for the device. I’d love to be able to download library books to my Kindle, as you can with the Nook and other e-readers. And the book sharing option they announced has yet to materialize. (UPDATE: As of Dec. 30, Amazon put Kindle lending into effect.) In the long run, I’d say Amazon is going to lose the very customers they want to attract if they don’t change with the times.

From what I’ve been reading recently, the jury is still out on the royalty rates for e-books. As a writer, I certainly want my book to be available in e-format, but I know I’d be seriously disappointed if it didn’t debut in print!

So what do you think? What are your reading preferences?

Holiday Gifts Featuring Colorado Authors

December 7th, 2010

Subscribe in a reader

It’s that time of year…Aren’t there some children, tweens, or teens on your list who would love receiving a book for Hanukkah or Christmas? As a child, a book was (and still is) my favorite gift!

Today’s post is dedicated to Tween and Teen books. A follow-up will feature middle grade, chapter books, and picture books. And this year, since we have an amazing community of writers right here in our state, I’m featuring Colorado authors exclusively. All links are to author web sites, where you can obtain more information about each book from the expert–the person who wrote it.

Let’s begin with Tween books.

Victoria Hanley: VIOLET WINGS

Traci L. Jones: FINDING MY PLACE

Denise Vega:  ACCESS DENIED

Lauren Myracle:  THIRTEEN PLUS ONE; VIOLET IN BLOOM

Ingrid Law:  SAVVY (Newbery Honor Book)

Now, onto Teen (YA) novels.

Julie Anne Peters:  RAGE; BY THE TIME YOU READ THIS, I’LL BE DEAD

Laura Resau: THE INDIGO NOTEBOOK; THE RUBY NOTEBOOK

Hilari Bell:  THE GOBLIN GATE; TRICKSTER’S GIRL

Todd Mitchell: THE SECRET TO LYING

Claudia Cangilla McAdam: THE AWAKENING

Paolo Bacigalupi: THE WINDUP GIRL; SHIPBREAKER (National Book Award nominee)

Alane Ferguson: THE DYING BREATH

Becca Fitzpatrick: HUSH, HUSH; CRESCENDO

Sarah Ockler: FIXING DELILAH

Linda Sandoval: FATHER KNOWS BEST

Tucker Shaw: ANXIOUS HEARTS

Brenna Yovanoff: THE REPLACEMENT

Tara Kelly: HARMONIC FEEDBACK

Whew! When I started compiling this list, I had no idea it would be so long. Which proves my earlier point: Colorado writers are amazing (and prolific)!


Steampunk. Who Knew?

November 16th, 2010

At our RMC-SCBWI Fall Conference, I had the pleasure of sitting next to a group of young adult librarians at the Saturday lunch. Shamelessly, I wasted no time in picking their brains to get ideas for my YA Lit class, which I’ll be teaching again this spring. One of them said the best book she’d read the past year—in any genre—was Scott Westerfeld’s Leviathan. I’d read The Uglies series by the same author, but hadn’t heard about this book. She went on to say Leviathan was “steampunk.”

When I looked completely blank, she took pity on me and provided a brief but intriguing explanation. Wow! Here was a genre I’d never even heard of.

Chatting between bites didn’t quite do it for me, so I had to educate myself. The first thing I did was to google it,  of course. And the second thing I did was to look at the Wikipedia entry for steampunk, which is very informative. Click on the link, because it will tell you far more than you’ll learn here! To my surprise, steampunk has actually been around for a number of years.

In my quest for enlightenment, I discovered that steampunk isn’t just literature—it’s fashion, jewelry, music, art, interior design, and probably lots of other things as well. Apparently, one shops at Etsy for all one’s steampunk needs.

Since literature is my main interest, here’s what I’ve learned so far about the genre:

  • Sub-genre of SF/Fantasy
  • Set in Victorian times
  • Employs steam-powered technology (but not always)
  • Features alternate history
  • Uses technology that was ahead of its time (but not our time), such as airships. Different, however, from airships we know and love, like the Goodyear blimp.

I watched a video of a panel discussion from Book Expo America, 2010. Authors Scott Westerfeld, Cory Doctorow, Cherie Priest, and NYPL Manager Karen Grenke took part. It was amusing to learn that they were inspired by Disney World (I nearly hyperventilated) and Star Wars.


Some of what the panelists said about steampunk:

  • It has great visual appeal
  • It’s a blend of high tech/low tech
  • Open to many ideas
  • Victorian manga
  • Informed by science fiction of the nineteenth century

This is what I’ve learned so far. What can you tell me about the genre? And what are some of your favorite steampunk novels?

Critiques

October 28th, 2010

Tomorrow my critique group is meeting here at my home. Aside from dressing in Halloween costumes and gorging ourselves with snacks, we have a manuscript to critique.

A year or so ago I wrote about the experience of having my own manuscript, Kissing Shakespeare, critiqued by my group. To say I was somewhat stressed is a gross understatement. Whenever I critique someone else’s work, I’m reminded of how vulnerable I felt–and always feel–when it’s my turn on the hot seat.

In my critique group, there are two kinds of critiquers: those who work with the manuscript as it is, and think about ways to strengthen it; and those who do that, but also come up with all kinds of new plot twists, characters, obstacles, and creative ways in which to take the story. I definitely fall into the first camp. Although I enjoy letting my mind run free with my own stories, I’m not really comfortable doing so with the manuscripts of fellow writers. I don’t like the idea of co-opting someone’s story and turning it into something it wasn’t intended to be.

That said, I think there is great value in having the highly creative types throw out their ideas. Sometimes the interplay that results creates an “aha” moment for the writer. And of course, one can always reject the suggestions that don’t fit with one’s own vision of the story.

A great book on revising–sorry, critiques inevitably lead to revision–is by Chris Roerden. It’s called Don’t Murder Your Mystery: 24 Fiction-Writing Techniques To Save Your Manuscript From Turning Up…D.O.A. Obviously, it’s specifically for mystery writers, but I’ve found that the advice Ms. Roerden offers would apply to most genres. My copy is highlighted and filled with post-its. When I was revising Kissing Shakespeare, I copied her essential tips and techniques onto index cards and kept them close by.

Happy Halloween! Hope the zombies don’t eat up your WIP.

Misery Lit: Have We Had Our Fill?

May 5th, 2010

I recently read that Daisy Goodwin, Orange Prize chair, was bothered by the unrelenting “misery” going on in the books eligible for the prize. In case you’re not familiar, the Orange Prize is awarded to a woman writer of any nationality for a novel written in English. After reading 129 novels, Ms. Goodwin told the Guardian, “There’s not been much wit and not much joy, there’s a lot of grimness out there…Pleasure seems to have become a rather neglected element in publishing.” She went on to say, “I was surprised at how little I laughed…and the [books] where there was humour were much appreciated, I can tell you.”

What really struck me was I how much I agreed with her. My book club had just read Shanghai Girls, by Lisa See. Most of us felt that while the book was well written and had compelling moments, it was also unrelenting in its misery. (We’re all fans of Snowflower and the Secret Fan and Peony in Love, BTW.) I can’t speak for everyone, but personally I felt it could have used some lightness—humor, romance, wit…anything to relieve the grimness of the story.

YA lit has its share of misery right now, too. Suzanne Collins, in her post-apocalyptic novels, The Hunger Games and Catching Fire, while making every moment gripping and often terrifying, somehow managed to instill a bit of hope. Maybe it’s in the quiet way Peeta loves Katniss, or in the way each wishes to save the other. I wish other writers of dystopian fiction would work a little harder at taking the edge off the hopelessness with a bit of joy. Find something to celebrate in all the bleakness. Something with a human connection.

I know we’re living in a scary, crazy world, and modern fiction reflects the concerns and anxieties of writers, and readers, too, I suppose. But I do wish all the horror, hopelessness, and mayhem could be interspersed with some offsetting moments of happiness. Isn’t that more reflective of life?

To quote Daisy Goodwin again, “I’m more of a light and shade person and there does need to be some joy, not just misery.”

What do you think? Are you longing for a little joy and humor in your reading?

Review of The Champion

November 8th, 2009

Elizabeth Chadwick has been publishing for years. Why did it take me so long to find her?

A writer of historical fiction, her specialty is the Middle Ages. She has nineteen books to her credit. See what I mean about not discovering her before now? Especially since her first book was published in 1989 (The Wild Hunt), and is still in print.

After I read  The Champion (1998), I took a look at her web site. It’s beautifully designed, has a Medieval look to it, and is packed with information about her books and research. You can also find her reference library (an extensive list of her resources), her biography, a glossary, music she enjoys listening to while writing, and much more.

The Champion begins with the two brothers, Hervi and Alexander, around whom most of the story revolves. Hervi is the older, and a seasoned tourney knight. He believes his younger brother Alexander is leading the religious life at Cranwell Abbey, where he’d been sent as a young boy. Abused by one of the priests, however, Alexander escapes and sets out to find his brother. Exhausted and near starvation when he arrives at Hervi’s camp, Alexander begs to be taken in. When he regains his health, Alexander begins training to become a tourney knight. Continue Reading »

YA Fiction: Past and Present

September 22nd, 2009

twilightgiver

Next Spring I’ll be teaching a class on young adult fiction. The class will examine themes which run through both classic and contemporary YA novels, and also study the way in which the genre has evolved over time.

LittleWomenY

I’m looking for your input! What one book defined you during your teenage years? Had the greatest emotional impact? A few lines describing exactly why that particular book meant so much to you would be helpful. If there’s more than one, even better!

I’d like to receive input from all age groups, but no need to reveal your age unless you want to. Your favorite book, by the way, can be from any time period. Many of the classics have been loved by succeeding generations–Little Women is one example.

And for those of you who read/write YA novels, which books among today’s writers resonate with you?

Can’t wait to hear from you!

hardlove practicallyperfect

speak

My Sinful Secret

September 8th, 2009

Until recently, I was one of those people who never read romances and was proud of it. Ugh. How stupid. How inane. How way, way beneath me. No thanks. Not me. Never. Ever.

Then someone in my Jane Austen group suggested I read a Georgette Heyer novel. Supposedly, the next best thing to reading Jane. Not my words, nor the words of the person who recommended Heyer, but I actually did read that somewhere recently. So I read Bath Tangle, and I loved it, which forced me to read several more of her books. Georgette Heyer, for the uninitiated, is the queen of Regency romance. She practically invented the genre. Her books are full of witty repartee, undercurrents of sexual tension, and meticulous historical detail. Heyer wrote from the 1920′s up until her death in 1974.

Someone else suggested Mary Balogh. I started with A Summer To Remember, read all the Simply’s, plus a few others, and I loved them all. Typically, they have a certain sweetness about them. Then I discovered Julia Quinn. Besides five of the Bridgerton family novels, I read The Secret Diaries of Miss Miranda Cheever and  Mr. Cavendish, I Presume. Quinn’s trademark seems to be humor, sometimes of the laugh-out-loud variety. Then I got going on Jo Beverly and her Rogues, and after that, Stephanie Laurens and the Bastion Club. Are you getting the picture?

Last winter, I was knitting a sweater that was way beyond my abilities, and therefore taking forever. To entertain myself, I began listening to audios of some of these books. Doing so saved me from insanity. Although in retrospect, perhaps concentrating too much on the stories caused me to make all those mistakes which eventually had to be ripped out. Unlike Georgette Heyer’s books, the modern regencies are very sexy!

For pure escapism, the Regencies can’t be beat. Oh, yes, there’s a formula to them, but that’s okay. It’s what romance readers expect, indeed, demand. At least I think it is. Because, as I mentioned before, I’m not really a romance reader.

Next »